The Amazing Spider-Man 2

  • The Amazing Spider Man 2Overstuffed but still entertaining, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is a close to average summer blockbuster.
  • Its greatest merit? Emma Stone (Gwen Stacy) and the character she plays. Courtesy of Stone, director Marc Webb and seven credited writers, Gwen Stacy is complex and interesting, becoming someone whom viewers can admire.
  • The picture’s visual spectacle is almost as strong. Spider-Man’s (Andrew Garfield) exploits are visually impressive, as are Electro’s (Jamie Foxx) and near everything else we see.
  • The audio design and score compliment on screen events well.
  • So do most of the performances. Garfield, Sally Field (Aunt May), Stone, Dane Dehaan (Harry Osborne) and Colm Feore (Donald Menken) are all excellent.
  • Jaimie Foxx, on the other hand, is miscast. While a multi-talented performer, Foxx is too handsome, too muscular, too recognizable to play Max Dillon, a supposed cipher. In Foxx’s hands, partially at no fault of his own, Max is not what he’s meant to be; instead, he seems a movie star with a bad hair-do.
  • There are also far too many characters in this film. Electro could be an interesting foil for Spider-Man. Ditto that for the Green Goblin/Harry, or the Rhinoceros (Paul Giamatti), but because there are so many villains, none of them are aptly developed.
  • Of them, Harry is the worst. His transformation from friendly and moral to rage-filled and villainous is too-sudden, which is also true of his hatred for Peter.
  • Furthermore, Harry’s illness is senseless. His father (Chris Cooper), suffering from the same sickness, lived to middle age, most of that time reasonably comfortably, whereas Harry is near death at twenty. Why?
  • Aunt May is underdeveloped and underutilized, a fact which means Sally Field’s empathic performance is wasted.
  • Even more troublingly, Peter Parker’s personal journey is rushed, at every stage.  He undergoes no less than three major internal conflicts. 1. To be or not to be with Gwen; 2. To help or not to help Harry; 3. To be or not to be Spider-Man. All three could make for compelling narrative, but the filmmakers misstep by shoving them into the same two hour film. They don’t have time to properly develop any of them, which means all fail to resonate.
  • Yet, there are some powerful moments here. Consider the clock tower scene, where Webb shows the truth and then patiently lets its settle on Spider-Man. From there Garfield takes over; his performance produces the finest moments of the franchise, at least thus far.
  • Finally, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 remembers it’s an action summer-blockbuster and is always fun.
  • It just isn’t memorable.
  • Final Grade: C-

8 thoughts on “The Amazing Spider-Man 2

    • You definitely needn’t rush. Mark Hobin called it a 120 minute trailer for movies yet to come. Now, I don’t hate it quite as much as him, but he’s not far off.

    • Well. In my grading scale, a C-minus means slightly below average. I figured, given the number of stars you gave it (1.5, right), you were calling it closer to my F or D grades. 🙂

  1. This one was a utter disappointment in every sense of the word. My goal was to see Rhino unleashed and that was hyped from the initial trailers. All I got to see was a teaser towards the next film…

    …which was essentially all this was.

    • I agree the film was disappointing, by a wide margin. And that the filmmakers’ decision to unleash so many characters a terrible one, Rhino included.

      But I don’t think this movie meritless, per se. Just below average.

  2. When I first reviewed this film I was particularly harsh on it. Weak character development, terribly cheesy (moreso than any of the previous outings), and too many villains/obstacles/inner conflicts (as duly noted by you).

    But I have to admit, this film has actually improved upon reflection. This doesn’t excuse it from settling on lazy writing at times and not being more captivating than it ought to have been but I think AMS-2 is a better product than it has been touted as thus far.

    All that said, I don’t blame many for being put off by this. There was a lot to handle here. The filmmakers didn’t quite do it.

    • Once again, I agree on every point. The flick probably fumbles more than it succeeds, but it still manages to be entertaining. And that is, at its core, the movie’s prime objective, right?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s